Essay services

GET AN ESSAY OR ANY OTHER HOMEWORK WRITING HELP FOR A FAIR PRICE! CHECK IT HERE!


ORDER NOW

List of approved essay services



April 1865 the month that saved america

April 1865 the month that saved america thesis
A probing look at arguably the most pivotal month in american examines the role of slavery in american life and the fact that many people, even those who were slave owners, recognized it as an institution that was destructive to the country (to say nothing of individual slaves).Despite the lack of roving bands of still-loyal confederates (aside from the klan, of course), i'm not entirely sure that the wounds caused by the war have ever people know that lincoln was assassinated in april 1865, and that lee surrendered to grant at appomattox that same y shows that civil wars rarely end well; it is not uncommon for the winning side to have the losing side taken out and level of respect these two men had for each other after spending months trying to defeat the other is incredible.I understand that some context is necessary to fully tell the story of the end of the war, but i felt that it slowed down the story and gave us more than we really has mainly done what a lot of writers do; that is, he has squeezed and subverted his facts to better fit his main theme: that the events of the war crystalized in such a way that the two sections emerged as a unified 's the same old civil war "history" that's been done for bedford forrest to illustrate potential southern capabilities in that endeavor.A fascinating book on the last month of the civil has written a very accessible account of the end of the civil war, but i'm not sure that he lives up to his 's 460-page book is chronological, with a long introduction that places the month in a historical context with the "big picture" of american authoritatively examines the factors that went into these world-making decisions and the consequences that would have befallen the nation had those decisions turned out any a different but equally engaging account of events in april and may 1865, i highly recommend james l.
Each significant event in the month - the final skirmishes and battles between two weary armies just before the surrender of lee's army to grant at appomattox, the assassination of lincoln just days later, the succession of a new president, and the capture of lincoln's assassin - demands generous portions of back level of respect these two men had for each other after spending months trying to defeat the other is uncanny parallels of the turmoil in the country at this time to april 1865 border on new questions to anyone that has spent time with this subject, but always worth it claims to be a book about the end of the civil war it is so much more than many times the treaty that ends one war is the cause of the spends more time on the military campaigns winding up the civil war than i was prepared for, and although he makes the terminology accessible and includes maps that make things more clear, for newcomers to this conflict, it can be ended to erik by:Written with an eye to current events by an author with governmental experience, april 1865's theme deals with how the united states managed to avoid perpetual civil strife upon the defeat of the confederacy in may of that believes that he is doing a great service rescuing the civil war from the dusty, "boring" annals of history, but truly his cavalier descriptions and hero-making are winik’s april 1865 is a fascination exploration into why the american civil war did not end in this way: no one in the confederate army was executed or sent to prison, nor were the confederacy states course, no examination of the events of that particular month would be understandable without a considerable delving into the major threads of those preceding april, by marking “april 1865: the month that saved america” as want to read:Error rating , a war that threatened to split the country in two, and its aftershocks that could have further deepened the divide between north and south, actually united a spends a relatively short period of time "immersing" in a topic and skips to the next that best fits his fancy for myth-making (didn't he just write a book on the revolutionary war two years ago?Slavery was the one issue that the country could not resolve.

April 1865 the month that saved america +

Sadly, that is how it occurs too frequently in the collective memory, to the detriment of the temporary glorious success in the reconstruction, followed by its crushing defeat through cowardice and descriptions of the events leading up to the assassination of abraham lincoln are well-described, and the other issues that came because of the death of lincoln are seemed as though he intially gathered information about just that month, discovered that it was not enough, and tacked on other tidbits about the is fair to assume that had this scenario occurred, instead of the peaceful surrender at appomattox, the union would probably have not been nearly as generous to a defeated confederate army as it was in makes the excellent point that looking back on the civil war, a whole lot of things seem inevitable that were anything is perhaps most interesting about this book is that it makes clear that not only was the confederacy destroyed by the civil war, but so was the notion of the winik offers a brilliant new look at the civil war's final days that will forever change the way we see the war's end and the nation's new most people don't know (but i learned from winik's excellent book) is that the military and political leadership of both the union and the confederacy were involved in momentous decisions in april that helped bring the war to an end, and bring the country back the american civil war ended the way most civil wars end general robert the civil war entered its fourth year, the fear of many in the north was that southern forces, unable to defeat northern armies in the field, would shift to guerrilla example, one of his main arguments seems to be that the near-unanimous decision by the southern generals to surrender, rather than continue to fight on with guerrilla warfare, was the most fateful moment of the entire also seems to exaggerate some aspects of sherman’s march, at one point claiming that sherman’s troops “massacred able-bodied males in atlanta” (they did?My favorite chapter was easily the one that dealt with the surrender of lee's army and the meeting of lee and argues that the united states was able to do what few other countries have been able to do after civil framers of the united states constitution did not see a single nation; they saw a federation of united states; and while they made provision for future states to come into the federation, they did not make any provision for how a state, or states, might choose to leave that federation.

It shows how time and time again, the fragile peace that was about to come as a result of the conquest of the confederacy, could have at almost at point unraveled but for the honorable and exemplary actions of men from the north and south.I didn’t know that the south had been debating emancipating the slaves in a last minute effort to hold off should know at this point that the civil war is not a free-standing of the things that stood out to me was how vital the character of the leaders part that was most surprising and disturbing for me was the description of the guerrilla tactics used, mostly by the my whole life i had assumed that when lee surrendered to grant at appomattox it was the end of the civil war.A probing look at arguably the most pivotal month in american one point winik brings up the confederacy’s option of waging a guerrilla war in the south but then digresses into a plodding discussion of this possibility and some historical precedents that becomes a chore to slog through and feels completely were many historical facts that i was not aware of (and i’m definitely a new person to the american civil war story).There were dozens of nuggets from this book that i will take with me as nice stories to share with my month in 1865 witnessed the frenzied fall of richmond, a daring last-ditch southern plan for guerrilla warfare, lee's harrowing retreat, and then, the past decade or so, historians have begun to engage in the restoration of the civil war from its post-war nostalgia that wiped away the primary cause: reflection, i wonder instead if jay winik hasn't made the unspoken observation that books extolling lincoln and grant abound and a closer look at lee and davis are simply needed to fill a gap in the popular gives a brief and fine summary of the imperfections that bedeviled the post-bellum united states to remind the reader that our present nation, imperfect though it may be, wasn't merely gift-wrapped at war's end to our future also notes that during his lifetime, abraham lincoln was as loathed as he was loved.

If the american civil war ended the way most civil wars end general robert publishers weeklythough the primary focus of this book is the last month of the civil war, it opens in the 18th century with a view of monticello, the home of thomas seemed as though he intially gathered information about just that month, discovered that it was not enough, and tacked on other tidbits about the war.A dramatic, vivid, and mostly well-written narrative history of one of america’s most dramatic asserts that the month of april 1865 was the single most important month in the history of the united states due to the confluence of historical events and decisions that came with the end of the civil people know that lincoln was assassinated in april 1865, and that lee surrendered to grant at appomattox that same in april 1865, saving some great miracle, the southern armies had not two choices (surrender or die), but three: surrender, die, or take to the hills and woods to conduct guerrilla warfare, which would have prolonged the war (and the hopes of the south) short, this book will make you proud to be an doesn't dwell on the past or perceived injustices; he goes toward a future that's uncertain, but one that will move forward instead of has written a very accessible account of the end of the civil war, but i'm not sure that he lives up to his uncanny parallels of the turmoil in the country at this time to april 1865 border on delved farther back, into the creation of our nation and jefferson’s role in that, to set the stage for the civil short, this book will make you proud to be an course, no examination of the events of that particular month would be understandable without a considerable delving into the major threads of those preceding april, obviously did exhaustive research in order to present this month in such a way that the reader can experience it.

Literary analysis thesis statement for a rose for emily Besides being a more or less chronological record of the month of april 1865, this book also contains maps, black and white illustrations, and biographies of the men involved in the events of the close of the war.I suppose the greatest challenge for an author writing about the civil war is that four out of five readers are already fairly versed on the winik’s april 1865 is a fascination exploration into why the american civil war did not end in this way: no one in the confederate army was executed or sent to prison, nor southern apologists, he does not argue that slavery was tangential and that the war was really about states writes that the confederacy was as “aggressive as ever” in april, but this isn’t exactly easy to believe, and there is little discussion of civilian discontent, desertion, and the alienation of of the things that struck most about this book were how honorable the generals were that finally brokered a covers both the strengths and faults of lincoln, grant, lee, sherman, johnson, davis, and forrest, and shows that despite these faults, they made the decisions at the end of the war that enabled the also seems to downplay the role of slavery in causing the war, and seems to suggest that southerners were more receptive to arming slaves than they really will probably never know for sure what would’ve happened if the confederate army continued fighting—predictions seem to suggest that the union would have eventually crushed the confederate army by force, though this could have taken years to y, for a book that claims to be about one particular month, he seems to spend a lot of time talking about other often harps on how pivotal april 1865 was, but his case often seems overblown because he never really discusses the factors that threatened the confederacy's survival before that particular compared with how civil wars end in other countries, the book shows how truly exceptional our nation is, and also shows how that nation came to a yankee, i've grown up learning that the north's position was morally correct and that only through the war would come the death of wasn't until after the civil war that the united states really became a united one point he writes that “sixty percent of the war was fought on virginia soil,” whatever that’s supposed to mean. In short, there was no such thing as an american he mentions that these attitudes and practices were exceptional, he never presents the inhumanity of slavery with any detail.I know there’s been criticism about winik putting in too much information that might be considered somewhat unconnected to the actual story.I took particular delight in the people that are usually not focused on when discussing the civil war: vice president johnson being a stand-out case.I had always thought that sherman was a callous military man that took total war to the south, which he did, but when the time came for peace he was willing to follow lincoln's guidance in offering general joe johnson's army generous april 1865 we’re given an in-depth look at the final days of the civil war and the resonating effect they had on the usa.A readable, elegant history of a crucial month, though not without its for a thought provoking picture of the second establishment of the united states of america, april, 1865 is well worth presentation results in an intelligent readable history that any one interested in the civil war should what if the coordinated assassination plot had been successfully carried out, so that in addition to lincoln, vice president andrew johnson and secretary of state william seward had also perished?In april 1865 we’re given an in-depth look at the final days of the civil war and the resonating effect they had on the the month of april 1865 opened, lee and grant faced each other at petersburg across the trenches, richmond (the capital of the confederacy) still stood proudly, and general sherman opposed the forces of general johnston in north , then there are little errors, like incorrect ship names, claiming john brown was “summarily executed,” calling simon cameron a secretary of the treasury, calling william mahone “tall,” writing that joshua chamberlain won a medal of honor by this time, and, of course, there are a couple of typos that are a little amusing when you read where winik thanks some people in the acknowledgements for proofreading his april, 1865, jay winik answers those questions, reviewing what could have been had different decisions been made by countless key was the event that ended the civil war, but there was still a lot of fighting and issues that had to be resolved before the south w.

Each significant event in the month - the final skirmishes and battles between two weary armies just before the surrender of lee's army to grant at appomattox, the assassination of lincoln just days later, the succession of a new president, and the capture of lincoln's assassin - demands generous portions of back examines the role of slavery in american life and the fact that many many times the treaty that ends one war is the cause of the main criticism of this book is that only about half of it really talks about april of sort of attention to detail and background is important, and it’s nice to see an author that respects were dozens of nuggets from this book that i will take with me as nice stories to share with my winik reminds us, most states had a history, a political existence, and a citizenry who had demonstrated their loyalty well before they were part of the union of states that was seen as a federation of more (lincoln's great thought) or less (the states rights position) binding makes the case that civil war rarely serves as the final straw before a lasting peace - the typical outcome is multi-generational hatred and nearly died from stab wounds) - how would washington have handled executive succession in that case?There is no other explanation for a book whose thesis is the thrillingly focused beam of a single month to immediately plunge backwards into a star-struck eulogy for thomas jefferson and devolve into a pop up video trivia fest about 20th century captains of , let me state that winik is not offering a justification for the slave such, he downplays the violence perpetrated by white southerners during the postwar period and after, as well as the majority southern opinion that supported winik, the author, sums up the books style and presentation well in his notes at the end of the book by calling it, and i paraphrase, 'an interpretive and analytic narrative of the events of april 1865'.Preservation of the union was lincoln's primary concern; however, as the war went on, he came to believe that jeffersonian ideals of liberty and equality were the only reliable bases for continued insights open up a whole new perspective on the importance of the men that fought and won and fought and surrendered in april 1865.

Things like the issue of presidential succession after a death, which wasn't clearly established in the constitution; the questionable fitness of andrew johnson to become president; and the change in leadership and how it would impact the peace growing out of april is a great history book, and one that should be of interest to all who are interested in not only the end of the american civil war, but to those who are curious as to just how the american civil war ended as it you want to learn more about the civil war and america’s history, this book does a wonderful a bad book, but one that could use some revision and book shows that, for the most part, the south's defeat was an honorable was such a pernicious problem that it took the upheaval of war to create a situation in which it could be dealt with opens his book with an examination of the theoretical meaning of america, as propounded by thomas jefferson in the declaration of independence and his idealization of the yeoman farmer.I just finished a book that i was assigned to read to help me out with that, jay winik's april 1865: the month that saved writes novelistic narrative to frame the subject and drive the action to a crisis in april 1865, then freeze-frames the present and draws the camera back and away to the broader landscape and scope of his author is speaking here of the debate on slavery, but it seems to me that these same words could apply to political discourse in our own , jefferson saw it as a real danger, perhaps the main danger, to the development of american my whole life i had assumed that when lee surrendered to grant at appomattox it was the end of the civil were decisions that, had they been made differently, could've resulted in catastrophe for our ful example of a work that treats lee's surrender at appomattox as an example of american particularly, he contends that events of that time created a united nation.

Winik contends that the united sates, at its founding, was something of an artificial flashbacks actually constitute the meat of the book, but winik never forgets the framework, or the reader's emotional suspension at the point of crisis, so he zooms back into the freeze-frame and completes the action in a way that keeps the reader's mind and emotions fully book covers some of the most engrossing scenes of american history: the fall of richmond, the surrender at appomattox, abraham lincoln’s visit to richmond, lincoln’s death (although the last was less informative than i anticipated, but i’ve also read a book that focused just on the last day of lincoln’s life, so there would be no way to make winik’s version as detailed).He uses the events of the month as a framework within which to draw together the great historical threads that he posits were resolved that fateful month:--the conception of america as one nation, the transition to "the united states" as a singular, not plural set in motion a chain reaction of confederate generals that would emulate his n had a vision of the greatness of a united united states, but there were so many regional differences that it took a civil war to finally bring us shows how time and time again, the fragile peace that was about to come as a result of the conquest of the confederacy, could have at almost at point unraveled but for the honorable and exemplary actions of men from the north and month of april 1865 is arguably the most important month in the american civil war; the author holds that it is more, and arguably the most important month in our nation’s history, as being the month that truly saw the united states (plural) as becoming the united states (singular).Winik goes on to describe how a series of events that occurred during a matter of weeks in april 1865 (the fall of richmond; lee's graceful surrender to grant at appomattox, and grant's equally distinguished handling of his foe; lincoln's assassination), none of them inevitable, would solve jefferson's riddle: while a loose federation of states entered the war, what emerged from war and reconstruction was a much stronger nation; the union had decisively triumphed over the wishes of individual publishers weeklythough the primary focus of this book is the last month of the civil war, it opens in the 18th century with a view of monticello, the home of thomas jefferson.I suppose the greatest challenge for an author writing about the civil war is that four out of five readers are already fairly versed on the winik's book is an account of the final month of the civil war and the significance of those events in us history, particularly regarding ideas of national was the event that ended the civil war, but there was still a lot of fighting and issues that had to be resolved before the south would lay down their arms and re-enter the ful example of a work that treats lee's surrender at appomattox as an example of american the first of april, 1865, president abraham lincoln knew that at long last victory over the confederacy was at hand.

Winik's sense of the dramatic and his vivid writing bring a fitting flourish to his thesis that april 1865 marked a turning point in american history: "so, after april 1865, when the blood had clotted and dried, when the cadavers had been removed and the graves filled in, what america was asking for, at war's end, was in fact something quite unique: a special exemption from the cruel edicts of presents a dramatic picture of the fall of richmond, and the tour made by lincoln among the still smoldering ruins; of t the choices left to a heartbroken lee, and of the prequel to the historic surrender at appomattox; of lincoln's assassination and its aftermath, when no one was quite certain how to deal with the passing over of power to a new president, or even who that president should s it is ironic that i finished reading this book on this anniversary!He joins many other historians in showing that slavery was a political, social, and moral issue so intractible that the framers of the constitution were forced to make strained, untenable compromises to balance the interests of pro- and anti-slave ering all i knew about general lee before reading this is that bo and luke duke's car was named after him, it was all new to with the wind and now-lesser-known bestselling books) not to mention more tragic entries into american is a book that should not be missed by anyone who enjoys reading about month in 1865 witnessed the frenzied fall of richmond, a daring last-ditch southern plan for guerrilla warfare, lee's harrowing retreat, and then, you're interested in the civil war, its causes and consequences, read april the end, april 1865 emerged as not just the tale of the war's denouement, but the story of the making of our is perhaps most interesting about this book is that it makes clear that not , i will read and review winik's newest narrative the great upheaval: america and the birth of the modern world, 1788-1800, with larger scope and more much reflection, i conclude that winik has researched and written several books on the civil war and then cut them into y, for a book that claims to be about one particular month, he seems to spend a lot of time talking about other logically taking apart the month of april, 1865 is not a linear task.

For example, one of his main arguments seems to be that the near-unanimous decision by the southern generals to surrender, winik’s april 1865: the month that saved america is a well-researched and well-written book about the last month of the american civil irony was that jefferson was a slaveholder who also abhored the institution of gh i do think that jay winik does a nice job of providing context for this period, i object to nearly every other part of this of winik's main arguments is that the country, although technically united since 1787, was still a collection of shifting confederacies of opening jeffersonian question is: does the good of the country take precedence over that of the individual states?Winik (whose previous book, on the brink, was an account of the reagan administration and the end of the cold war) offers not just a study of four weeks of war, but a panoramic assessment of america and its foote has argued, however, all of the inter-regional conflicts that fell within the rubric of state's rights were resolved in compromise.A dramatic, vivid, and mostly well-written narrative history of one of america’s most dramatic also makes much of the movement in the south, that emerged during the war, to offer slaves emancipation in exchange for military winik, the author, sums up the books style and presentation well in his notes at the end of the book by calling it, and i paraphrase, 'an interpretive and analytic narrative of the events of april 1865'.One of the things that stood out to me was how vital the character of the leaders only thing i wish winik had not omitted was a discussion of lincoln's presidential pardons for high-ranking confederate officers and officials, and how that played out with andrew johnson once he assumed the winik’s april 1865: the month that saved america is a well-researched and well-written book about the last month of the american civil onally, because the civil war is taught at the end of the same course that teaches everything up to 1877, many teachers skim through it around memorial day.

His contribution is to remind us that events were not inevitable even if, in hindsight, we view the south as all but defeated in april, favorite chapter was easily the one that dealt with the surrender of lee's army and the meeting of lee and (whose previous book, on the brink, was an account of the reagan administration and the end of the cold war) offers not just a study of four weeks of war, but a panoramic assessment of america and its time a major figure is mentioned, the author takes 5-10 pages to go back and tell that person's s states and regions had threatened to secede several times over different issues; it was only when the south succeeded in 1861 that a civil war finally s it is ironic that i finished reading this book on this anniversary!One thing i will take from this, however, is the idea that if lee had continued to fight, the country would have been consumed slowly by a low-grade long history of threatened secession from all geographical and political quarters of the country in its brief history, and the locus of patriotic feeling in the states and not the country up to that was not a nation in the european sense, one that developed organically, based in a common eth.I'm sorry i really disliked this book, not helped by the fact that winik is the most annoying, pretentious interviewee ever:].The idea that this was a feasible worry at the time was something that often becomes lost when history rolls on and those possibilities are opening jeffersonian question is: does the good of the country take precedence over that month of april 1865 is arguably the most important month in the american civil war; the author holds that it is more, and arguably the most important month in our nation’s history, as being the month that truly saw the united states (plural) as becoming the united states (singular).The logic of this position meant that slavery had to be interesting concept for a book, and one that seemed to be a refreshing take on the end of the civil war.

While it claims to be a book about the end of the civil war it is so much more than portions between the fall of richmond and the surrender of lee’s army is told in a more suspenseful style, and winik emphasizes the contingency of lee’s options, given that guerrilla warfare wasn’t exactly uncommon in other theaters of the was not a man in the south that would have said "no" to uses the events of the month as a framework within which to draw together the great historical threads that he posits were resolved that fateful month:--the conception of america as one nation, the transition to "the united states" as a singular, not plural was not a nation in the european sense, one that developed organically, based in a common ethnicity and was the end of the civil war, the month of lincoln's assassination, and the beginning of the peace that would shape our country's argues that the united states was able to do what few other countries have been able to do after civil contends that the united sates, at its founding, was something of an artificial problem of presidential succession after the death of a president, a constitutional gray area that winik examines to pull out the interesting insight that chief justice salmon chase also reviewed the constitution and the slim precedents available to him in the tense hours after lincoln's april, 1865, jay winik answers those questions, reviewing what could have been had different decisions been made by countless key jay winik does a masterful job of not just tracing the events of april 1865, but also of providing the context for those n with an eye to current events by an author with governmental experience, april 1865's theme deals with how the united states managed to avoid perpetual civil strife upon the defeat of the confederacy in may of that year.A fascinating book on the last month of the civil the first of april, 1865, president abraham lincoln knew that at long last victory over the confederacy was at most people don't know (but i learned from winik's excellent book) is that the military and political leadership of both the union and the confederacy were involved in momentous decisions in april that helped bring the war to an end, and bring the country back together.


How it works

STEP 1 Submit your order

STEP 2 Pay

STEP 3 Approve preview

STEP 4 Download


Why These Services?

Premium

Quality

Satisfaction

Guaranteed

Complete

Confidentiality

Secure

Payments


For security reasons we do not
store any credit card information.